Narrative Voice in Documentary Film Response

 1. Considering the articles you've read for class today, which documentary mode or modes does the film borrow from? Please explain specific elements from the film to support your observations.

The film resembles the Expository Mode in the sense that it very historical. From the account of  WWII, this segment feels very factual, explaining the events of that time. Also, the filmmaker has left himself out of the scene. Things to Remember also brings in a level of the Poetic Mode, because of the feeling of emotion.

2. Why do you think the filmmaker chose to automate the voice of the narrator? What does it add or detract from the film?

The monotone, computer generated narrator represents the feeling that no one is left. It gives a very cold, apocalyptic feel. It also gives the feeling that you are listening to the news. This “siri” styled voice somewhat masks the identity of the people in the story, making the story seem less personal. 

3. What were some of the more experimental aspects of the film in terms of image and storytelling?

The use of text almost felt like a data entry of historical facts and the repetitive scenes throughout the film made it feel very traditional. Many of the scenes of various empty American towns were long and slow, creating a level of emptiness. It also left a feeling of uneasiness when the monotonous style and rhythm was mixed with the tension of music. 

4. Does the film come across as a work of fact or fiction? Why?

This film has a very nostalgic “looking back” feel. I think the film comes across as factual. The horrific recounting of actual wars and the presentation of old photographs had the film feel like a trip to your grandparents house, while you listened to old stories.